Legal Opinion

Barrow v. Georgia Lightweight Aggregate Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 16, 1961No. 38639PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge.

The defendant, in its brief, states that the complications arising in the pleadings with reference to interpretation became so complex that it is doubtful that any sort of affirmative analysis can be made, and that the pleadings reached such a state that the plaintiff, the defendant, and the court were at all times in doubt as to the status of the issues. With respect to this statement, we deem it sufficient to point out that the numerous assignments of error by the exceptions and the amended motion for a new trial total some 39 claimed errors.

The first contention of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Harris v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Engle v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Battle v. KilcreaseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Frye v. PyronCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. OB-Gyn Associates of Albany v. LittletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  2. Hopkins v. First Union BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. MONTEGA CORPORATION v. HazelrigsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  4. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron-Workers, Local 387 v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. LamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API