Taylor v. Taylor

STRINE, Chief Justice.

Appellant Austin' L. Taylor 1 (the “Husband”) appeals from a Family Court decision denying his Motion to Reopen an Alimony Order, which was entered by the court without his participation. On appeal, the Husband argues that a default judgment was not appropriate under Rule 60(b) because he was not properly served, and he did not have a fair opportunity to contest the amount of the obligation imposed upon him. 2 Christina A. Taylor (the “Wife”) opposed his motion during the proceedings at the Family Court and argues on appeal that the default alimony order should stand.

The…