Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1995No. A94A2456PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was tried before a jury and found guilty of incest, rape and aggravated sodomy. This appeal followed the denial of defendant’s motion for new trial. Held:

1. Defendant first contends the trial court erred in admitting incriminating statements he uttered in the presence of a law enforcement officer after he refused the officer’s requests for defendant to execute a form indicating waiver of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (86 SC 1602, 16 LE2d 694). This enumeration provides no grounds for reversal as any error in admission of these…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  3. McLendon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Hight v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Tukes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Pendarvis Construction Corp. v. Cobb County-Marietta Water AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Dent v. Candler Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API