Legal Opinion
Edwards v. City of Chico
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1972No. Civ. 12928PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COAKLEY, J. *
Plaintiff’s unverified amended complaint for personal injuries alleges that while employed by the United States Department of Labor as an enrollee in its WIN (work incentive) Program, and while on the golf course of defendant city in his capacity as a WIN enrollee, plaintiff was injured by reason of defendant’s negligence. He seeks damages.
The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c) upon the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter. The motion was granted and judgment for the defendant followed.
The motion is supported…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Solari v. Atlas-Universal Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Union Lumber Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barragan v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Azadigian v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Massey v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- County of Sonoma v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Nagle v. Ringling Bros. & Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.