Legal Opinion

Energy Express, Inc. v. Department of Public Utilities

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 3, 2017No. SJC 12262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLowy, J.

Prior to 1999, the supply, transportation, and distribution of natural gas to consumers in the Commonwealth were “bundled” together and provided by a State-endorsed monopoly, referred to as a “local distribution company” or “LDC.” The Legislature “unbundled” these components, allowing private companies, referred to as “marketers,” to compete as suppliers of natural gas in the Commonwealth. Transportation and distribution of gas, however, remained the sole province of the LDCs. To ensure that consumers who opted to purchase gas from marketers continued to receive a sufficient supply of gas,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. ThornburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Central States Electric Co. v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Meikle v. NurseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  4. Bay State Gas Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  5. DSCI Corp. v. Department of Telecommunications & EnergyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  2. Michael D'acci, Carol D'acci, Ardon McCarthy, Jason Monast, Melanie Monast, Linda Westgate, Gary Westgate, Brandon Empey, Krystile Empey, and Melissa Bessey v. Massachusetts Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API