Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Mitsui & Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 16, 1928No. 19237PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERRIGAN, District Judge.
This is an action brought by the owners of the steamship Oregon against Mitsui & Co., Limited, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the Oregon, the result of a collision between it and the steamship Horaisan Maru, which occurred March 8, 1926, on the bar at the entrance to Grays Harbor in the state of Washington.
The Oregon left San Francisco March 4, 1926, bound for Grays Harbor. On the same day the Horaisan Mara left Grays Harbor, and, while passing out over the bar, stranded and become a total loss. The position of the wreck was on the range used by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The PlymouthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Cornell Steamboat Co. v. P. Sanford Ross, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- The City of TauntonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. Pitney the Eureka No. 110. The St. CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Eastern Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Eastern Transp. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1928
- Ingram Corporation v. Ohio River CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1973
- Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. Pitney the Eureka No. 110. The St. CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951