Legal Opinion

Dalton v. Mayor & Council of the City of Hoboken

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 20, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bkown, S. C. C.

The plaintiff moves to strike out the defendants’ answer as sham or frivolous and the defendants move to strike out the complaint as not stating a cause of action. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the Ciholder” of four improvement certificates of the city of Hoboken in a total sum of $1,800; that the certificates are long past due and though demand was made payment was refused. The defendants deny the allegations in the complaint and by way of separate defenses charge that the improvement certificates were issued without consideration or authority ; that *217the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Knabe v. Hudson Bus Transportation Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. Callan v. BodineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  3. Freeman v. ConoverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  4. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co. v. United Lead Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  5. Apfelbaum v. PierceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. New York Life Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
  2. Ziegler v. Henry Maurer & SonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API