Legal Opinion

McWilliams v. Martin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 4, 1939No. 6 Div. 496PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

Bill in equity to set aside and cancel a judgment at law, valid on its face, because the complainant has a meritorious defense to same which she failed to present because of fraud, accident or mistake. It is essential to the equity of such a bill that the averments of same should show diligence on the complainant’s part and negative negligence as to the failure to present her defense in the law court.

It may be conceded that the bill sets up a good defense to the action at law, but it, in effect, shows that the failure to present same was due to the neglect or failure…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barrow v. LindseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Alabama Chemical Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Manegold v. BeavanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Albert Hass Lumber Co. v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. First Nat. Bank of OpelikaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Blanks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Ex Parte BergeronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Ex Parte BettisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Ex Parte AaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API