Legal Opinion

Smith Lumber Co. v. Garry

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 6, 1919No. 7 Div. 999PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, St. Clair County; O. A. Steele, Judge. Action by the Smith Lumber Company against Tony Garry, wherein the Company, as execution creditor, contested defendant’s claim of a homestead exemption. Prom an adverse judgment, the contestant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

This is a contest by an execution creditor of the defendant’s claim of a homestead exemption.

The evidence shows without dispute that the claimant leased his alleged homestead in December, 1917, for a period of three years, and thereupon moved away, and his occupation ceased.

[1] Prior to the statute, any leasing and transfer of the possession of the homestead to another whereby the owner was disabled for a term from returning and occupying it at pleasure was per se an abandonment of the homestead right. Stow v. Lillie, 63 Ala. 257; Boyle v. Shulman, 59 Ala. 566; Scaife v. Argall, 74 Ala. 473.

By…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fuller v. American Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Boyle v. ShulmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Scaife v. ArgallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Pollak v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Stow v. LillieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miles v. MilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Tharp v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Barber v. BeckettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. Shaddix v. BilbroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Trapp v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API