Legal Opinion

Medina v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 21, 2001No. 85,437PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

Mary Jane Medina claimed underinsured motorist insurance coverage following a default judgment against the tortfeasor. American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American Family) appeals the district court’s judgment that it is liable to Medina for underinsured motorist coverage. We reverse.

On June 21, 1992, Medina’s vehicle was stopped at an intersection when it was struck from behind by another vehicle. That vehicle was driven by Jose M. Camacho (Jose M.). Medina alleged personal injury. She was insured by American Family with under-insured motorist coverage of $100,000. Jose M.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Bank IV Wichita, National Ass'n v. PleinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Guillan v. WattsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. Haas v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  5. Barnes v. Continental Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. LE v. JoslinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  2. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bahr-RennerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. KANNADAY v. BallCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  4. Dillon Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API