Legal Opinion

De Moss v. Walker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 10, 1951No. 47856PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMulroney, J.

The questions involved in this appeal are limited to the correctness of the instruction on damages and the adequacy of the verdict. Plaintiff, as administrator of his mother’s estate, recovered a judgment of $100 against the Walkers as damages for the death of intestate, who died as a result of the alleged negligent'operation of the Walker car. Plaintiff appeals, and the errors assigned are: (1) that the court erred in instructing the jury on the matters to be considered in arriving at the amount of their verdict and (2) the amount of the verdict was grossly inadequate. These were two grounds…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gaydos v. DomabylSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Bridenstine v. Iowa City Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Armbruster v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. South Texas Coaches, Inc. v. EastlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Weitl v. MoesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Wardlow v. City of KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  4. Madison v. ColbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Amos v. Prom, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API