Nie v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Pro Se Plaintiff; In Forma Pauperis Application; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction.
ORDER
HORN, J.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The plaintiff, Harry Nie, filed a pro se, “COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND” 1 in this court on September 25, 2015, along with an application to proceed informa pau-peris. (emphasis in original). Plaintiffs complaint begins:
This is a LAWSUIT[ 2 ] pursuant to: 1) 28 U.S.C.A. § 1491, Tucker Act jurisdiction, seeking $95,000 each year in compensation damages for unjust loss of plaintiff-property’ rights to continued employment with General Dynamics Amphibious System, since government…
2Cases cited111 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Embrey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020