Legal Opinion

Nie v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 30, 2015No. 15-1071CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se Plaintiff; In Forma Pauperis Application; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction.

ORDER

HORN, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The plaintiff, Harry Nie, filed a pro se, “COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND” 1 in this court on September 25, 2015, along with an application to proceed informa pau-peris. (emphasis in original). Plaintiffs complaint begins:

This is a LAWSUIT[ 2 ] pursuant to: 1) 28 U.S.C.A. § 1491, Tucker Act jurisdiction, seeking $95,000 each year in compensation damages for unjust loss of plaintiff-property’ rights to continued employment with General Dynamics Amphibious System, since government…

2Cases cited111 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Embrey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API