Legal Opinion
United States v. Rondrell Sanford (05-6489) Tyshawn Hill (05-6500)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 6, 2007No. 05-6489, 05-6500PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J., joined by Sutton, J.,
MERRITT, J. (p. 396), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Tyshawn Hill and Rondrell Sanford appeal an order of the district court denying their motion to suppress evidence discovered after a traffic stop for following another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent. TeNN.Code Alnn. § 55-8-124. Specifically, defendants claim that the initial stop was not sup*393ported by probable cause or reasonable suspicion and the ensuing detention, search, and arrest were consequently tainted and unconstitutional.
For the reasons that follow, we affirm'.
I
O…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Scottie Ray HurstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Heriberto Navarro-Camacho v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Alan Baynes v. Brandon ClelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Peggy Welshans Williamson, and Vanessa Welshans v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Longaberger Co. v. KoltCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Asher v. Unarco Material Handling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.