State v. King
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Simpson, J., denying a motion for a new trial after a trial and conviction of the crime set forth in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted in the district court of Hennepin county as an accessory to a felony after the commission thereof, and he appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
We shall take up and dispose of the assignments of error, or those we deem necessary to refer to specially, without a preliminary statement of the facts in the case, any further than is found in the indictment, the main portions of which are set out below. .The facts in detail will more fully appear in connection with some of the propositions discussed and decided. The various…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HaywardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Strom v. Montana Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- State v. SalversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State v. RickerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1848
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. CrumpIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Swain v. Tennessee Copper Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Evans v. KlusmeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.