De Graum, Aymar & Co. v. Jones
Supreme Court of Florida
The above entitled cases were argued and submitted together, and but one opinion was delivered therein. The original opinion was delivered at the June term, 1885 ; a re-hearing was granted, and the opinion on re-hearing was delivered at the January term, 1887. The facts of the two cases are similar, and those oí the one last named, Brenner, Son & Co., vs. Jones et al., are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chief-Justice delivered the opinion of the court:
The facts in these cases are identical. The bill alleges that the complainants were merchants in the city of Philadelphia; That the defendants, B. Jones, Lewis Willis and Mrs. E. G-. Chipley, who was a married woman, were jointly engaged as merchants in business in Pensacola, and held themselves out as copartners.
That the goods sold to Jones, Willis & Co., were of the value of $2,338.76, which is unpaid. That complainants sold said goods on the sole credit of the persons composing the firm of Jones, Willis & Go., and for the purpose of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Blumer v. Pollak & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1882
3Cited by23 opinions
- Christopher v. NorvellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- State ex rel. Attorney-General v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- Hoaglin v. C. M. Henderson &. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Matthews v. McCainSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.