Legal Opinion

Gower v. Lamb

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1955No. 29234PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN. FERRISS, Special Judge.

The trial court sustained defendant’s motion for judgment on an agreed stipulation of facts, and plaintiff appealed. The parties apparently regarded the hearing on defendant’s motion as the trial of the case, as plaintiff’s first point on appeal refers to the case as “tried pursuant to Revised Statutes of Missouri, 1949,' Section 510.310 [V.A.M.S.],” -which section deals with procedure in cases tried upon facts without a jury. Plaintiff, however, filed no after-trial motion, and appellate review is therefore limited in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 3.23.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ney v. Yellow Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Ross v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  4. Guthrie v. City of St. CharlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Zuber v. Clarkson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Liberto v. HolfeldtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  2. Stone v. BetheaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
  3. Kaelin v. NuelleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Dix v. Motor Market, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Lopez v. HeesenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API