Legal Opinion

Deese v. Combined Specialty Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 26, 2011No. 05-10-00707-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice LANG-MIERS.

This case arises from a workers’ compensation claim filed by appellant Tina Deese. 1 Deese’s claim was contested by appellee Combined Specialty Insurance Company (“CSI”), Deese’s employer’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier. After a hearing, an officer of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission (“TWCC”) (1) found that Deese sustained a compensable injury and was disabled, and (2) ordered CSI to pay Deese medical and income benefits in accordance with his decision. After CSI unsuccessfully appealed to an appeals panel of the TWCC, CSI filed this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Combined Specialty Insurance Co. v. Deese, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  3. In the Interest of J.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Wells v. Barrow, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shaw, Evan Lane (Van) v. Lemon, D. Brent, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  2. Medicus Insurance Co. v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Abdul Khan v. the Chai Road, Inc., D/B/A Waterjet Works, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2017
  4. Phoenix Thera-Lase Systems, LLC v. Curewave Lasers, LLC, Daniel Herbert, Laser Concepts, LLC and Lyle Blackwood, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API