Portenier v. Walsen
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
The parties to this litigation are before us in reverse order of their positions in the trial court. As a matter of convenience they will be herein designated as plaintiff and defendant, as they there appeared. Those noted as interveners do not appear here.
Plaintiff, as executor of an estate to which belonged some mining claims near Idaho Springs, on November 30, 1940, granted a right of entry upon the claims “for the purpose of searching for and removing therefrom mineral bearing ore for a period of ninety days from the date hereof with the right to continue from month to month thereafter…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pope v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Murphy v. TraynorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- Hall v. BeymerColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
- Morgan v. PowersNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Reck & Riehl v. CaulfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Washburn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
- Walsen v. GaddisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
- Washburn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965