Legal Opinion

Good Samaritan Hospital v. Mathews

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1979No. 77-3308PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:

Appellant [Good Sam], the plaintiff below, appeals from a judgment dismissing its claim in an action prosecuted under the provisions of Title XVIII of the Social Security Act and related statutory provisions. The controversy grows out of a claim filed by Good Sam against appellee Blue Cross of Oregon [Blue Cross] for reimbursement of interest on construction loans as a current expense item under the Medicare Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395, et seq. (1970). In general, the controversy presents the question of whether interest costs incurred by Good Sam during the period of its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Humana of South Carolina, Inc. v. CalifanoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Columbia Basin Land Protection Ass'n v. SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. White Memorial Medical Center v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Cubanski v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Good Samaritan Hospital v. F. David MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API