Legal Opinion

Marino v. Alliaud

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 1959Published

1Per curiam

In this action to recover damages for personal injuries, the complaint was dismissed on the merits at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. If the dismissal was properly on the merits, then, if there is any evidence to sustain the judgment, it will not be disturbed. (McNulty Bros. v. Offerman, 141 App. Div. 730, 732; Wittemann Bros. v. Forman Bottling Co., 178 App. Div. 674, 675.) If the dismissal was in the nature of a nonsuit, then the plaintiff is entitled to have it reviewed in the light of the facts and inferences most favorable to her. (Veazey v. Allen, 173 N. Y. 359, 367.)

After plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Veazey v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Deeley v. . HeintzNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. McNulty Bros. v. OffermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Trimble v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Wittemann Bros. v. Forman Bottling Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API