Wright v. Moffitt
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice:
The issue on appeal is whether a “Dram Shop” 1 patron who purchases alcoholic liquor from a tavern operator has a cause of action against the vendor for personal injuries resulting from the patron’s voluntary intoxication. ’
We conclude that such a cause of action does not exist in this State under either the common law or present Statutes and, therefore, the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing the complaint must be affirmed.
I
In testing a motion to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim for relief, all well-pleaded allegations are, of course taken as true. 2…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Spence v. FunkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
- Cunningham v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Duane S. Marusa v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- McClellan v. TottenhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Grayson Fraternal Order of Eagles, Aerie No. 3738, Inc. v. ClaywellKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
- Felder v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Smith v. SewellTexas Supreme Court · 1993
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.