Legal Opinion

Fillmore v. Department of Public Utilities

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 8, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The petitioners appeal pursuant to G. L. c. 25, § 5, from a decision of the Department of Public Utilities (D.P.U.). The single justice reserved and reported the case without decision.

The facts are not in dispute. Until May, 1957, the Hudson Municipal Electric Plant (Hudson) supplied the petitioners with electricity under a commercial lighting and power rate, called the B rate. In May, 1957, the B rate was cancelled and two new rates were put into effect.One rate, C, was “available for any purpose.” The other rate, D, was available to “Commercial and Industrial Customers whose monthly demand…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan District Commission v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  2. Mitchell v. SilversteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Southeastern Land Co. v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  4. Spear & Co. v. Pub. Serv. Com.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scottie Industries, Inc. v. DonohoeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
  2. Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Doctors Hospital of Worcester, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  3. Whitinsville Water Co. v. CovichMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API