Legal Opinion

Murray v. Preferred Accident Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 13, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vermilion, J. —

The appellee is the beneficiary named in a policy of accident insurance, and sued to recover $10,000, the amount the policy provided would be paid to the beneficiary in case ^le insured, Robert Murray, lost his life directly, and exclusively of all other causes, Nom bodily injury effected solely through aecidental means. The petition alleged that the death of the insured was caused by a gunshot wound inflicted by some person to the plaintiff unknown. The appellant’s an swer denied that the insured came to his death solely through accidental means; alleged, as a complete…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Ley v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Arneberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Zimmerman v. Bankers Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Chicago Lumber & Coal Co. v. GarmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  2. New England Trust Co. v. BrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. McLevis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Murray v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. U. D. Sawyer and Dessie Sawyer v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation, a Corporation, Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation, a Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. U. D. Sawyer and Dessie Sawyer, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API