Legal Opinion

Alozie v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 22, 2012No. 08-582CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WHEELER, Judge.

This case concerns the claims of 58 current or former law enforcement officers to be paid time-and-one-half overtime compensation for their daily 30-minute lunch break. Plaintiffs work as Detention and Deportation Officers (“DDOs”) or Immigration Enforcement Agents (“IEAs”) in the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Field Office. Plaintiffs’ claims are for back pay and liquidated damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (2006) (“FLSA”). Plaintiffs allege that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. John Burich v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Bennett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Aldrich v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API