Ross v. Bachkurinskiy
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-defendant Matthew S8. Ross appeals the denial of his motion for relief from judgment with respect to a default judgment that was entered against him in favor of the appellees-plaintiffs Elvira, Igor and Tanya Bachkurinskiy (collectively, the Bachkurinskiys). Specifically, Ross claims that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the sanction of a default judgment because his failure to comply with the discovery requests along with his violation of the court's order compelling discovery did not constitute bad faith. Concluding that Ross's conduct did not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Nesses v. Specialty Connectors Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- State, Department of Natural Resources v. Van KeppelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Nyby v. Waste Management, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Drew v. Quantum Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Whitaker v. BeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Munster Community Hospital v. BernackeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- JK HARRIS & CO., LLC v. SandlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Mallard's Pointe Condominium Ass'n v. L & L Investors Group, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Wheatcraft v. WheatcraftIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.