Legal Opinion

Cot'n Wash, Inc. v. Henkel Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 26, 2014No. Civ. No. 12-650-SLR, 12-651-SLRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBINSON, District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

On May 23, 2012, Big 3 Packaging, LLC (“BSP”) and Cot’n Wash, Inc. (“Cot’n Wash”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) filed suit in this district against Henkel Corporation, The Dial Corporation (“Dial”), and Henkel Consumer Goods, Inc. (collectively, “the Henkel defendants”) alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,037,319 (“the ’319 patent”). (Civ. No. 12-650, D.I.l) On the same day, plaintiffs asserted the ’319 patent against The Sun Products Corporation (“Sun”) in a related case before this court.1 (Civ. Nó. 12-651, D.I.l)

The…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sysmex Corporation v. Beckman Coulter, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API