Aaron v. Everett
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Judge.
In this Employment Security Division case, the Board of Review denied appellant benefits because he reported for work under the influence of intoxicants. Appellant contends (1) the decision is not supported by substantial evidence, and (2) the actions attributed to appellant were not “misconduct” as that term is defined by case law.
Arkansas law clearly provides that an individual shall be disqualified for benefits if he or she is discharged for misconduct in connection with the work on account of reporting for work while under the influence of intoxicants. Ark. Stat. Ann. §…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rainbolt v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
- Smith v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weatherford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Carter v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Jones v. Director of LaborCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- School Employees Credit Union v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Giacona v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992