Legal Opinion

Barr Inc. v. Town of Holliston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 3, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

Contracts for the construction of public buildings estimated to cost above $100,000 “shall be awarded to the lowest responsible and eligible general bidder.” G. L. c. 149, § 44A (2) (D). The question before us is whether, when an awarding authority is making a determination as to bidder re*113sponsibility, it is constrained to look only at materials compiled as part of the Department of Capital Asset Management’s (DCAM’s) contractor certification process. See G. L. c. 149, § 44D. We conclude that the competitive bidding statute places no such restriction on awarding authorities.1

1. Background. We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Interstate Engineering Corp. v. City of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Ward v. PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. John T. Callahan & Sons, Inc. v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Capuano, Inc. v. School Building CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  5. Fordyce v. Town of HanoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mello Construction, Inc. v. Division of Capital Asset ManagementMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  2. Chadwick v. Duxbury Public SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API