Legal Opinion

Beaver v. Porter

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 17, 1905PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Dallas District Court.— Hon. Edmund Nichols, Judge. Action to recover a sum named, alleged to be due as commissions earned in connection with a sale of real estate. The trial was to a jury and there was verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff. The defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

The petition is in two counts. In the first plaintiff alleges that in September, 1902, the defendant, a resident of Minneapolis, Minn., and one C. A. Diehl, a resi-' dent of Des Moines employed J. E. Alpaugh and W. H. Dinnell, real estate agents residing in Adel, Iowa, to act as their agents to find purchasers for tracts of Canada land of' which they were owners; tliat the compensation agreed upon' *42for their services was thirty-five cents per acre on the acreage for which they found purchasers; that said agents found purchasers in one Gudgel, to whom there was sold 6,400 acres of said lands,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eames Vacuum Brake Co. v. . ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Ostrander v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Washington N. Gas Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Hull v. H. A. Johnson & Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1900
  5. Golden v. Bartlett Illuminating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Progressive Retailer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Barham v. Bank of DelightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Frazier v. RayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Schaffer v. Estate of RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  5. Sparks v. Spaulding Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API