Legal Opinion

Carneal v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 12, 1823PublishedCited by 5 opinions

^ error on a 0f f/ie Hardin circuit court. Statement af the case. Statement the case. of statement ot" the case. -Statement the case. r statement of the case, Statement of the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court.

James Miller filed his bill in chancery, in the court below, against James Wilson, alleging that he had made a contract with said Wilson for 500 acres of land, two hundred in one tract, tobe conveyed on demand, and three hundred adjoining, out of another survey, to be conveyed in one year, at twenty shillings per acre; which contract was reduced to writing and exhibited; that the 200 acres were conveyed, and the 300 acre tract not yet conveyed; that he had paid for the 200 acres and received a conveyance, but had received none for the 300 acres, for which the purchase…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adair v. CumminMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Wright v. MillerNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  3. Wright v. MillerNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  4. Head v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1824
  5. Rankin v. M'DowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1820

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API