Adair v. Cummin
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Shiawassee. Bill to revive partition proceedings. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.
For many years prior to May 14, 1878, •complainant and defendant Cummin owned in common the S. óf sec. 13 and tbe N. E. J of see. 24 in township 5 N., of B. 2 E., Shiawassee county. Cummin’s interest was under mortgage to defendants Gallagher and at the date mentioned the complainant filed his bill against Cummin and said mortgagees in the circuit court for the county of Shiawassee, in chancery, to obtain partition. Such proceedings were had that partition was decreed and on the nomina*377tion of the parties through their solicitors the defendants Gale, Dawson and McKellop were appointed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Humes v. ScruggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Verplanck v. . Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Rea v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- McDonough v. O'NielMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Wallace v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. WessonMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
- McKinney v. CurtissMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Ramsey v. McKameyTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Banks v. BillupsMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Simpson v. SimpsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.