Legal Opinion

Marino v. Moffa

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1918No. Appeal, No. 151PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 151, Oct. T., 1917, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. No. 1, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1916, No. 228, on pleadings in case of Domenico Marino and Elvira Marino v. Agostino Moffa and Maria Incoronata, his wife. Ejectment for strip of land in the Third Ward of the City of Philadelphia. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was in entering judgment for plaintiffs on the pleadings.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Orlady, P. J.,

David E. Simon was the owner of a city lot fronting on Tenth street and extending of equal width to Delhi street, the length of the lot being 69 feet and 9% inches. On November 21, 1902, he sold a part of the lot fronting on Tenth street to Marino and wife, describing it “containing in front or breadth on said Tenth street, 14 feet, 3 inches, and in length or depth, 46 feet, 6 inches, more or less, to other ground of David E. Simon.” On the same day he executed a deed to the defendant’s predecessor in title, for a lot or piece of ground fronting on Delhi street, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hymen v. GattaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Eshleman v. RankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co. v. SurowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API