Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Surowski
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
At the close of the proofs in this ejectment case a verdict was directed in plaintiff’s favor for the land described in the writ. The jury, on the remaining issue of mesne profits, found for the plaintiff in the sum of $300. Judgment was entered on these verdicts .by the court en banc. Defendant seeks a new trial contending that the question of title to the land involved was also for the jury. The judgment will be affirmed.
The dispute goes to a small rectangular piece of land 60 by 125 feet, well up on a steep and rocky hillside in East Deer Township, Allegheny County, upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Miles Land Co. v. Hudson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Dawson v. CoulterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Brownsville Lodge No. 357 v. Great American Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth of Pa. v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doman v. BroganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Pencil v. BuchartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Douglas v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Kotal v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953