Legal Opinion

Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 10, 1879PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Young J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

Baldwin, being owner in fee of an undivided third of certain lands in Hennepin county, executed a bond, on January 8, 1878, conditioned for the conveyance of the same to Welles upon his (Baldwin’s) being paid $2,500, and interest, on or before five years from said date. The bond contained apt words binding Welles to make the payments mentioned, and was executed by him as well as by Baldwin. On February 1, 1878, in the district court for Hennepin county, one Thompson recovered and docketed a judgment against Baldwin; and upon an execution issued thereon, said undivided third was, on March 30th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ware v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  2. M'Mullen ex rel. Rudy v. WennerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1827

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shraiberg v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Latin-American Bank v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. Welles v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Coolbaugh v. RoemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Mark v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API