Legal Opinion

Scarato v. Hayward

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 1969No. Nos. 33174, 33229PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Commissioner.

This matter reaches us on cross-appeals from the .action of the trial court in granting defendant’s motion for new trial on the limited ground that one instruction was erroneous. Plaintiffs had received a jury-verdict for $500.00 actual and $1,000.00 punitive damages on a petition charging defendant with refusal to return an earnest money deposit. The jury returned .a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor on defendant’s counterclaim. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for new trial on the basis that plaintiffs’ verdict-directing instruction submitted disjunctively two…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Environmental Quality Research, Inc. v. Mercantile Trust National Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Lewis v. Columbia Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Ward v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Kansas City v. GarzaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Mondelli v. Saline Sewer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API