Brown v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1ConcurrenceClinton, Judge
The answer given to the first question is correct.1 To the second question posed by appellant the plurality quickly, broadly and irrationally responds with an erroneous answer. While it may be that the Texas Constitution does not provide “an independent basis that would support the Court’s conclusion” on original submission,2 see, e.g., Rochelle v. State, 107 Tex.Cr.R. 79, 294 S.W. 860, 863 (1927) (Opinion on Rehearing), still we ought not gratuitously to say that the reason there is not “an independent basis” is because we have3 and “shall *800continue” to interpret our Constitution “in harmony”…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.