Legal Opinion
Matter of Petition of Soto
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 23, 1989PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
236 N.J. Super. 303 (1989)
565 A.2d 1088
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF GLORIA E. SOTO FOR A DECLARATORY RULING AS TO THE APPLICABILITY OF N.J.S.A. 5:12-138 TO CERTAIN POLITICAL ACTIVITIES. GLORIA E. SOTO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION AND DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, DIVISION OF GAMING ENFORCEMENT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 31, 1988.
Decided October 23, 1989.
Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, DEIGHAN and BAIME.
Edward N. Fitzpatrick argued the cause for appellant (Clapp & Eisenberg,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Karins v. City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Ayhan Hakimoglu v. Trump Taj Mahal Associates Trump Taj Mahal, Inc. Donald Trump the Trump Taj Mahal Corporation Tm/gp Corporation. Ayhan Hakimoglu v. Boardwalk Regency CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- In Re the Commitment of N.N.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- DePaul v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- New Jersey State Bar Ass'n v. BermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.