Legal Opinion

State v. Farrell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1973No. Cr. 457, 462, 463PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEIGEN, Judge.

In these three cases penitentiary sentences were imposed upon the defendant, Farrell, and upon the petitioners, Loeb and Mahrer, for delivery and delivery and sale of a controlled substance in violation of Chapter 19-03.1, N.D.C.C., known as the Uniform Controlled Substances Act.

The defendant Farrell has appealed from the judgment and sentence, raising as the only issue the legality of the sentence.

The petitioners Loeb and Mahrer, who were defendants in the criminal actions referred to above, raise the same issue by habeas corpus proceedings, which proceedings were consolidated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Grand Forks v. Grand Forks CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Davis v. RiedmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Backman v. GuyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. NewtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HogieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. LebusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. VermilyaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. BOUCKNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. HogieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API