Legal Opinion

General Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1924No. 16055PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeYoung

Charles Smith made an application to the Industrial Commission for' compensation by the General Construction Company, the plaintiff in error, for an accident which resulted in the death of his son, Virgil Smith.

It was stipulated before the arbitrator that on August 11, 1922, Virgil Smith was in the employ of plaintiff in error; that both parties were under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation act; that on that day Virgil sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment, of which injury notice was given within thirty days and on account of which a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pocahontas Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Indian Hill Club v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Ascher Bros. Amusement Enterprises v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Chicago, Wilmington & Franklin Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Messmer v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Air Castle, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Bauer & Black v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Weil-Kalter Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Siete v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API