Legal Opinion

Reizenstein v. Shinseki

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 29, 2009No. 2009-7012Published

1Opinion of the Court

RANDALL D. REIZENSTEIN, Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2009-7012.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: September 29, 2009.

Kenneth M. Carpenter, Carpenter, Chartered, of Topeka, Kansas argued for claimant-appellant.

Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. With him on the brief were Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Tara K.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  5. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API