Legal Opinion

Weber v. ASSOCIATED SURGEONS, PS

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2009No. 82163-1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

206 P.3d 671 (2009)

Charles WEBER and Brenda Weber, husband and wife, Petitioners,

v.

ASSOCIATED SURGEONS, P.S., and/or now d/b/a Surgical Specialists of Spokane, P.S., Respondents.

No. 82163-1.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

May 7, 2009.

Dennis W. Clayton, Spokane, WA, for Petitioners.

Robert F. Sestero II, Evans, Craven & Lackie, P.S., Spokane, WA, for Respondents.

2Per curiam

¶ 1 At issue is whether Charles Weber properly served Associated Surgeons, P.S., with his complaint for medical malpractice. We grant review and reverse the Court of Appeals, holding that service upon the registered agent's office…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crystal, China & Gold, Ltd. v. Factoria Center Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  2. Weber v. Associated Surgeons, PSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LowtherCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  2. Michelle Dalen v. St. John Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API