Legal Opinion

State v. Dimaplas

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 16, 1999No. 79,508PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Larson, J.:

This is the State’s appeal from an order dismissing a criminal case where the trial judge disqualified all attorney members of the Saline County Attorney’s office because two trial witnesses were a present and former member of that staff. The trial judge determined there was an impermissible appearance of impropriety as well as a conflict of interest.

The record shows Rudolpho Dimaplas was charged on May 19, 1997, with feloniously operating a motor vehicle while his driving privileges were revoked, a level 9 nonperson felony. The charge was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Miller, William G.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. State v. DonlaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. Hutchinson National Bank & Trust Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  5. Haynes v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. Venters v. SellersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  3. State v. HurdSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Johnson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hart v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API