Legal Opinion · Dissent

James D. Arms v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1984No. 83-5470Published

1DissentCornelia G. Kennedy, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority of the panel that arson may be proved by circumstantial evidence and that State Farm is entitled to the benefit of every inference favorable to it which may be fairly drawn. However, the circumstantial evidence here was simply insufficient. In addition to proving motive and the fact that the fire was of incendiary origin there must be evidence that the insureds had an opportunity to set the fire, or of some additional circumstance that establishes culpability.

Generally, opportunity is considered to be something more than proof that there was a possibility that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. G. L. Boone v. Royal Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  2. Elgi Holding, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Quast v. Prudential Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Gregory's Continental Coiffures & Boutique, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. Goodwin v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API