Legal Opinion

Mason v. Harlow

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 23, 1914No. 18,681PublishedCited by 11 opinions

OPINION DENYING A REHEARING. Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 2; Frank D. Hutchings, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

At the trial in the district court the plaintiff relied on the existence of certain pleaded facts as the basis of the equitable relief which he demanded. The existence of those facts was denied by the defendant. Evidence was introduced by both parties bearing upon the issues of fact thus raised. The result was a conflict in the evidence, essential portions of which were oral. The journal of the court shows that the court determined these issues in the following manner:

“Now on this 14th day of December, 1912, this cause came on for hearing,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knaggs v. MastinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Hopper v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Mason v. HarlowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Readicker v. DenningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Emery v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Alexander v. ClarksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Perry v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Cooper v. SeavernsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Harlow v. MasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API