Legal Opinion
Younggren v. Younggren
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 26, 1996No. C7-96-334PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Duane Younggren and Fay Ryden appeal from the denial of their motion for a new trial. Respondent filed a notice of review, raising a number of issues. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants Duane Younggren and Fay Ry-den are the children of respondent Luther Younggren. During most of respondent’s life he was self-employed as a farmer. In addition, respondent ran an aerial crop-spraying business and a trucking business. Since 1974, respondent has farmed in cooperation with his son, Duane. They maintained separate farms and accounts, but shared labor, machinery, and some expenses.
In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Halla Nursery, Inc. v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Citizens State Bank of Hayfield v. LethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Beliveau v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Blohm v. Minneapolis Urological Surgeons, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Rebne v. RebneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Keefe v. BernardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- In Re ThamesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- In re Baycol Products LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Gellert v. EgintonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. PoetschkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.