Legal Opinion
Goodman v. Wise
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided August 6, 1981No. 1949PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOUNG, Justice.
This is an election contest. Both parties, Robert M. Goodman and Herman Wise, who were candidates for the office of City Commissioner of Harlingen, Texas, bring appeals from the judgment of the trial court. Contestee Goodman challenges the constitutionality of the bond filing requirements of the Texas Election Code arts. 9.09-9.13 (1967). Contestant Wise challenges certain voter irregularities in the election. The trial court found that Mr. Goodman was the duly elected candidate and denied all other claims for relief of the parties. We affirm.
The election was held on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ray v. Farmers' State Bank of HartTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Cavanaugh v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Gamza v. AguirreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Copenhaver v. BerrymanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Hubbard v. AmmermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Reese v. Duncan, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
- Guerra v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
- Honts v. Shaw, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Green v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Medrano v. Gleinser, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.