Legal Opinion

Muth v. Aetna Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 8, 1951No. 10279PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJOR, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment adverse to the plaintiff, entered August 7, 1950, in an action wherein plaintiff sought relief in a variety of forms by reason of an oil and gas lease in which he at the time of its execution acquired a one-half interest. The cause was referred to a Special Master who, after hearing, made-findings of fact and conclusions of law, which in the main were approved by the trial court. Consistent with such report, the court entered the judgment from which plaintiff has appealed.

There is little, if any, dispute concerning the facts as found by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fast v. WhitneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Cromwell v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Johnston v. CourtialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Lewis v. NanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. True Oil Company v. GibsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Exxon Corp. v. Crosby-Mississippi Resources, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. Murphy v. Amoco Production Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1984
  4. Muth v. Aetna Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Exxon Corporation v. Crosby-MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API