Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Amoco Production Co.
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided May 2, 1984No. Civ. A1-82-91PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN SICKLE, District Judge.
This diversity case involves two oil and gas leases. The complaint has three counts, but the third count, a claim for an accounting, was severed from the main trial. See Order dated February 24, 1984. The remaining counts were tried before the Court on February 28-29, 1984, with the parties stipulating to certain background facts.
Plaintiff owns the mineral interests in the S% of Section 2, all of Section 3, the E% of the NE'/i of Section 10, the SEV4 of Section 10, the EV2 of the SWV4 of Section 10, the SW 1 /) of Section 11, the NV2 of Section…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McCurdy v. HughesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Amoco Production Co. v. North Dakota Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- LeBar v. HaynieWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Olson v. SchwartzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Schank v. North American Royalties, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. Hess Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Greenfield v. ThillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Eason Oil Co. v. Howard Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Anderson v. Hess Corp.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2010
- Amoco Production Company v. Leland M. Jacobs and Ethel D. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.