Legal Opinion

Tahoe Pines Co. v. Newman

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1922No. Civ. No. 4276PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

This is a suit in equity brought by the plaintiffs as vendors to specifically enforce the provisions of a contract relating to the sale of certain real property. The contract sued upon was entered into between the defendant and Ferguson-Breuner Co., a copartnership, which copartnership was subsequently incorporated under the same name. 11 At the time the transaction was had the copartnership did not have title to the property, but it was, subsequently acquired by plaintiff Tahoe Pines Company/ which latter corporation was formed shortly thereafter for the purpose of acquiring title to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Easton v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Jones v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Wolff v. CloyneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. May v. SullivanMississippi Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lubin v. LubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Lee v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASS'NCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Boys Town, U.S.A., Inc., a Nevada Corporation v. The World Church, a California Corporation, Jackson Appliance, Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API