Culley v. Royal Oaks Chrysler Jeep, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROY L. RICHTER, Presiding Judge.
Jimmy Culley (“Claimant”) appeals the denial of worker’s compensation benefits from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”). Based on Claimant’s failure to adhere to the rules of appellate practice, we dismiss Claimant’s appeal.
I. DISCUSSION
Claimant’s brief violates several provisions of Rule 84.04. Failure to substantially comply with Rule 84.04 preserves nothing for our review and warrants dismissal of the appeal. McCullough v. McCullough, 195 S.W.3d 440, 442 (Mo.App. S.D.2006).
First, we note Claimant’s statement of facts violates Rule…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Davis v. ColemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Shumpert v. ShumpertMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Murphy v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Gant v. Lou Fusz Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rothschild v. Roloff TruckingMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Parker v. American Publishing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hampton v. FrancisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Bradley Burgan v. Kenneth NewmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021